Inventive Law Inc.
  • mail@inventive.law
  • Home
  • Services
  • Attorneys
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Clients
    • Make A Payment

Software and business method patents

icon22

Software and method patents may appear to have fallen out of favor because of recent court decisions and legislation. However, recent trends indicate that they comprise surprisingly high portions of four US companies’ recent grants.

Source: IPWatchdog

Better than half of the patents issued to Google and Microsoft by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in 2014 were methods-related patents, and more than one-third to IBM and one-quarter to Apple. This is according to data collected and analyzed by Envision IP, a law firm specializing in patent research.

Alice v. CLS Bank decided in June by the United States Supreme Court made the bar for affirming software patents considerably higher than in the past. Software inventions now have to show that they are not directed to mere abstract ideas or that they are not simply existing solutions that have been expressed with a computer.

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), which was established as a result of the American Invents Act, also made proving validity more challenging, especially for methods patents. Reviews to date have invalidated nearly 78% of claims in cases instituted by the PTAB, with almost a quarter of all AIA petitions filed in fiscal year 2015 directed towards methods claims.

Despite the new case law and recent legislation some active patent filers continue to pursue and receive patents in significant numbers in USPTO classifications 700-708, 715, 717, 726 and 902, which are typically associated with software and methods. (See pie chart below)

pie-chart

The Numbers Tell a Story

Companies intent on obtaining method patents include Google, for the first time in 2014 in the top ten of US patent recipients, in eighth place just behind Toshiba and Qualcomm. Of the 2,599 US patents granted last year to Google, 1,522, or 59% were in the methods classes. Microsoft, with 2,847 patents received, had 1,575, or 55%, that fall under the heading of methods.

Perennial US patent recipient leader IBM secured 7,540 patents, and received the most methods-related patents with 2,916, 39% of its total grants for last year. Not to be outdone was Apple, with 2,037 patents, 538 or 26%, which are associated with software and methods. Samsung, LG, Qualcomm, Panasonic, Canon and Toshiba, all top-ten US patent recipients for 2014, secured less than 10% in methods.

Methods patents were up slightly for IBM, Microsoft and Apple from 2013 and 2012. However, Google received 69% more methods patents in 2013 than it did in 2012 (1,225 vs. 723) and 24% more in 2014 than the previous year (1,522 vs. 1,225).

Our analysis indicates that many of the foreign multinational technology companies that top the list of US patent recipients are focused on receiving hardware and non-software related patents.  For example, less than one-tenth of the patents issued last year to Samsung Electronics, Canon, Toshiba, Panasonic, and LG Electronics were in the methods and software-related classes that we analyzed. This is not necessarily surprising, as these Korean and Japanese technology icons have for decades been known for their diversified consumer electronics products, notably televisions, cameras, and media players.

Microsoft, Apple, Google, and Sony tend to sell products that are software or methods-dependent and are connected to smart devices powered by cloud technologies. We would expect these companies to have a higher percentage of recently issued patents in software and methods-related classes.

The data also suggest that some large filers may believe that their software and methods-related patents are better than others that have been previously granted and can be defended, if necessary. Another possibility is that recent methods recipients believe there is little likelihood that their patents will ever be tested in court or at the PTAB.

issued-utility

percentage-2014


Read article HERE | SOURCE: IPWatchdog

Reduced Fees for TM Applications and Renewals College Claims Copyright Infringement of Michelangelo Statues

Related Posts

Ralph Lauren in a Trademark Dispute With U.S. Polo Assn.

News & Updates

Ralph Lauren in a Trademark Dispute With U.S. Polo Assn.

Google’s New Program Aimed at Squashing Patent Trolls

News & Updates

Google’s New Program Aimed at Squashing Patent Trolls

Notifications About Patent Applications via USPTO’s Email Alerts

News & Updates

Notifications About Patent Applications via USPTO’s Email Alerts

Read More:

  • Ralph Lauren in a Trademark Dispute With U.S. Polo Assn.
  • Google’s New Program Aimed at Squashing Patent Trolls
  • Notifications About Patent Applications via USPTO’s Email Alerts
  • All Stories
  • Apple’s Back With Another Patent: Hand Gestures
  • Relying on Own Research Might Not be a Good Idea for Inventors
  • What if the Internet Was Patented?
  • A Photographer’s Fight Against a Dumb Patent
  • The Story of One of the Most Prolific Inventors in History
  • John Deere’s New Patents Reveal Farming Innovations
Inventive Law Inc.
© Inventive Law Inc. 2022

Home of INVENTIVE® and INVENTIVE LAW® Legal Services

Privacy Policy | Site Map

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
SAVE & ACCEPT